The 2026 US Open schedule is trending as a volatile men’s tournament collides with a far more predictable women’s draw. ESPN lists Carlos Alcaraz as the men’s favorite and Aryna Sabalenka as the women’s favorite, while early upsets have made the path to the men’s title much harder to read.

Fans searching for today’s order of play are trying to answer two questions: which contenders are still standing, and whether the tournament’s contrasting storylines will continue in New York. The available coverage highlights the major trends and title favorites, but it does not provide a complete match-by-match schedule for today.

Why is the men’s US Open draw so unpredictable?

According to ESPN, the men’s side has been defined by upsets. Several expected contenders have lost earlier than anticipated, opening space for other players to make deeper runs. That has left Alcaraz as the most prominent favorite in a draw where the list of likely semifinalists and finalists is less certain than it appeared before the tournament.

The result is a schedule with heightened interest around every round. A match involving a highly ranked player may no longer feel routine, while a less familiar name can quickly become one of the tournament’s central stories. For viewers planning their day around the US Open, the men’s order of play matters because the bracket has not followed the straightforward script many fans expected.

Alcaraz remains the key name to watch. ESPN’s odds coverage identifies him as the leading men’s favorite, but that status does not eliminate the uncertainty created by the tournament’s earlier results. His presence gives the men’s competition a clear focal point even as the rest of the field becomes harder to predict.

Why does the women’s draw look different?

The women’s tournament has followed a more familiar pattern. ESPN describes the draw as “chalky,” a tennis and betting term for a tournament in which favorites and higher-seeded players continue advancing instead of falling in major upsets.

That makes Sabalenka the central figure on the women’s side. ESPN lists her as the favorite, and the survival of other leading players has helped preserve the possibility of marquee matchups later in the tournament. Rather than tracking a bracket emptied of its biggest names, fans are watching to see which top contenders will meet as the competition moves toward its decisive stages.

The contrast with the men’s draw is part of what makes the schedule especially compelling. The men’s side offers uncertainty and potential breakthroughs; the women’s side offers the possibility of established contenders meeting as expected. Together, those narratives give each day of play a different kind of significance.

Who should fans watch at the 2026 US Open?

The New York Times published a preview of 30 champions, contenders and rising stars to watch at the 2026 US Open. That broad list reflects how much talent is competing in New York, beyond the two players who currently lead the odds.

For fans using the schedule as a guide, the preview provides context for the names appearing throughout the draw. Established champions bring title experience, contenders are trying to convert strong form into a breakthrough, and rising stars are seeking the kind of win that can change their standing in the sport.

The schedule also shows which storylines are moving to the forefront. As the field narrows, matches involving tournament favorites carry the pressure of expectation, while meetings featuring rising players can determine who becomes the next major name to follow. The New York Times’ 30-player guide gives viewers a way to place those matches in the wider tournament picture.

What has the US Open looked like in New York?

The tournament’s visual story is also drawing attention. USA Today has published a gallery of unforgettable 2026 US Open tennis photos from New York, adding an emotional record of the competition alongside the daily match coverage.

The gallery matters because the US Open is not only a set of results and scheduled sessions. Tennis photography captures the intensity of the event, from the concentration of players to the atmosphere surrounding matches in New York. Those images offer a companion to the schedule for fans following the tournament as it develops.

For the latest match times, fans still need the event’s current order of play. The headlines reviewed here establish the tournament’s main story: Alcaraz and Sabalenka are the leading favorites, the men’s draw has produced notable upsets, and the women’s competition has remained unusually chalky.